• After the Welfare State
  • ESFL RC's
  • August Liberty Fund

The Latest from SFL

Webinar with Dan Klein Tonight!

Join SFL and students from all over the world TONIGHT, May 2 at 8PM EST for a webinar with Professor Dan Klein. We’ll be discussing the tension between direct and overall liberty, and the validity (or invalidity) of violating liberty in the short term to preserve it in the long term.

Prof. Klein’s talk will explore possible disagreements between direct and overall liberty. Direct liberty corresponds to the inherent aspects of a policy reform (and its concomitant enforcement), while overall liberty subsumes also its wider and long-run aspects. If direct and overall liberty often disagree, then there is ambiguity in saying whether a policy or action augments “liberty”—a term that is almost never clarified by the distinction between direct and overall—and critics will contend that “liberty” is meaningless or illusory. Some areas of possible disagreement are genuine and perhaps significant—the three most notable being military actions, controlling pollution, and what we call “coercive hazard.”

Where? On your computer at 8pm EST!

Facebook Event Here | Register Here

Daniel Klein is a Professor of Economics at George Mason University. He holds degrees from George Mason University and New York University, where in both cases he studied the classical liberal traditions of economics. His teaching focuses on economic principles and public policy issues.

Professor Klein has published research on policy issues including toll roads, urban transit, auto emission, credit reporting, and the Food and Drug Administration. He has also written on spontaneous order, the discovery of opportunity, the demand and supply of assurance, why government officials believe in the goodness of bad policy, and the relationship between liberty, dignity, and responsibility.

Klein is the coauthor of Curb Rights: A Foundation for Free Enterprise in Urban Transit, editor of Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct, and editor ofWhat Do Economists Contribute?

Posted in Events | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Join SFL Leadership, Applications Close Today!

SFL President Alexander McCobin turns 26 today. Look at that handsome man!

Attention SFL’ers! Not only is today SFL President Alexander McCobin’s birthday, but it’s also the last day to apply for two of SFL’s leadership programs. Check out the deets!

Campus Coordinator Program: The Campus Coordinator Program is the driving force behind SFL’s work in providing resources and support for pro-liberty student groups. A Campus Coordinator (CC) is a student leader who operates remotely from their home campus with three main objectives: to assist student groups in their region, to establish new student groups in their region, and to help organize and run SFL events in their region. TODAY IS THE LAST DAY TO APPLY FOR THE 2012-2013 CAMPUS COORDINATOR CLASS! Do it now!

SFL Charter Teams: The SFL Charter Teams program seeks to build the student movement for liberty around the world by identifying, training, and supporting the strongest student leaders of liberty in areas currently underserved by SFL (i.e. outside the United States, Canada, and Europe).  All students selected to the Charter Teams Program will undergo a rigorous 3 month online training program with biweekly readings and online seminars on the philosophy of liberty and management techniques.  This training will educate Charter Team members in the best practices SFL has developed over the years to effectively create a student movement for liberty in new areas.  Once the online training program is completed, Charter Teams will begin to start student groups at their own schools and schools nearby, run events that educate others on the meaning of liberty, and seek to identify other pro-liberty students in their areas.  The goal is for Charter Teams and the individual members achieve success in building the student movement for liberty in their area to create long-lasting, meaningful mechanisms of supporting pro-liberty students. Today is the last day to apply! Do it now!

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Protesting Unions by… Eating Ice Cream?!

The following is a guest submission by Kasey Ashford, president of Cornell Libertarian Club:

Cornell Libertarians at their unionized ice cream stand

This is the first year during my time at Cornell when the Industrial and Labor Relations College’s Union Days did not go unchallenged. The ILR School is a statutory college with the goal of “advancing the world of work.” Each year the college hosts a weeklong series of lectures and events known as Union Days. During this week, notable union leaders, such as this year’s keynote Randi Weingarten, come to speak and students are encouraged to attend a union career fair and events promoting student activism in the labor movement. The most frustrating part of this is that it is all funded by New York taxpayers.

This year the Cornell Libertarian Club challenged this blatant and single-sided promotion of unions by hosting a satirical “unionized” ice cream sundae stand. While there are arguments to be made about how unions impede on individual freedom, we decided to focus our event on the economic inefficiencies of unions. The idea came out of a discussion with Justin Pulliam from CampusReform.org, and we were able to actually pull off the event with the help of the Students For Liberty Protest Grant.

The Cornell Libertarians organized this event on April 13th and set up our free ice cream stand in the middle of the most active student plaza. We set up a table that had an assembly line of bowls and spoons, different ice cream flavors, and toppings. A member of the club was responsible for each of these of sundae components. But, each of the servers could only perform specific functions.  For example, one server was only allowed to serve cookies and cream ice cream and give out spoons, but he couldn’t do both at the same time. This became especially frustrating when the ice cream servers had to go on their mandatory relief breaks. If someone wanted chocolate ice cream but that server was on a break it would hold up the entire line.

Cornell Libertarians on their "mandatory union break"

Every now and then the workers would also go on strike. When the customers in line asked why the servers were on strike, the servers replied they didn’t know and were happy with their job, but their union boss was paying them. After the customers finally made it through the assembly line with their free ice cream, I asked them to rate their service with options ranging from “good” to “amazing.” Afterwards, we gave them a flyer with more information of some of the downsides of unions.

When they rated our service, I got a chance to hear participant’s reactions to the event. I asked him about the quality and efficiency of their service and asked for their opinion on incentives to improve, such as offering a bonus or firing servers for doing a bad job. Most people quickly caught on to the satire and walked away pretty entertained. Of course, there were a few ILR students who were not amused and continued their refusal of incentives playing any role in work efficiency.

That afternoon we served about 150 people, including students, professors, and families visiting campus. Hundreds more students stopped by the stand to see what was happening and take a flyer. After our event, several club email listservs discussed it throughout the day. One of my friends even informed me that we were bar talk that night by some rather displeased ILR students. My favorite feedback came from another student who wrote to me that, “It was such a clever way to raise awareness. Everyone I talked to thought it was refreshing and not just something like protesting or handing out quarter cards.”

As a graduating senior, it felt really good to finally challenge the ILR School and its “Union Days” activism with a counter-event of our own. Engaging the student body in a discussion that showed both sides of the labor movement was really important to me after so many years of this single-sided advocacy of unions. It was also a really different approach to promoting an idea and so it caught a lot of attention.  I can truly look back on this event and proudly say that our club was able to influence ideas at Cornell.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Direct versus Overall Liberty: An Online Discussion with Professor Dan Klein

Join SFL and students from all over the world on Wednesday, May 2 at 8PM EST for a webinar with Professor Dan Klein. We’ll be discussing direct versus overall liberty.

Prof. Klein’s talk will explore possible disagreements between direct and overall liberty. Direct liberty corresponds to the inherent aspects of a policy reform (and its concomitant enforcement), while overall liberty subsumes also its wider and long-run aspects. If direct and overall liberty often disagree, then there is ambiguity in saying whether a policy or action augments “liberty”—a term that is almost never clarified by the distinction between direct and overall—and critics will contend that “liberty” is meaningless or illusory. Some areas of possible disagreement are genuine and perhaps significant—the three most notable being military actions, controlling pollution, and what we call “coercive hazard.”

Where? On your computer at 8pm EST!

Facebook Event Here | Register Here

Daniel Klein is a Professor of Economics at George Mason University. He holds degrees from George Mason University and New York University, where in both cases he studied the classical liberal traditions of economics. His teaching focuses on economic principles and public policy issues.

Professor Klein has published research on policy issues including toll roads, urban transit, auto emission, credit reporting, and the Food and Drug Administration. He has also written on spontaneous order, the discovery of opportunity, the demand and supply of assurance, why government officials believe in the goodness of bad policy, and the relationship between liberty, dignity, and responsibility.

Klein is the coauthor of Curb Rights: A Foundation for Free Enterprise in Urban Transit, editor of Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct, and editor of What Do Economists Contribute?

Posted in Events | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How SFL’s Campus Coordinator Program Changed My Life

Two years ago, I was a typical 20-year-old. I went to school, had a part time job, and had no idea what I was doing with my life. That summer, I went to FIRE’s Campus Freedom Network, mostly because I had nothing better to do. The conference changed my life. In addition to meeting many fantastic free speech advocates, I met students who worked with Students For Liberty.

Christine-Marie Dixon

My father raised me with a healthy skepticism of government, and my mother taught me from childhood that rights are inalienable and cannot be legislated. My first memory of this is from when I was about two years old. I told her that if I ever became president the first thing I would do would be to make cigarettes illegal. She sat me down and told me that I couldn’t do that, and even if I did, it wouldn’t work. “You can’t tell people what they can and can’t do with their bodies,” she told me.

While I have always been a libertarian deep down, my beliefs were not something I thought about much until I was 20. Of course I was dissatisfied with the way things are, but I never considered that I would be in a position to affect change, at least not for several years after I had left college and entered the “real world.”

And then I discovered Students For Liberty. When I met these people at the CFN conference, I was immediately fascinated by their world. I wanted to be one of them. Here were college students who, like me, went to class and work but were also part of the growing student movement for liberty, actively working to create change. They, like me, were concerned with preserving liberty and making the world a freer place. Unlike me, they were doing something about it.

I was hooked. That year, I started the Madonna University Students For Liberty on my college campus. The day the applications for the 2011-2012 SFL Campus Coordinator class opened, I applied.

Joining the ranks of SFL leaders was a defining moment of my life, and now, on the brink of graduation, I feel like I have accomplished so much more in my college career than just studying and going to parties. I started a pro-liberty group on my campus and helped other student groups on campuses in my area. I have networked with students and leaders in the liberty movement. I have focused my passion for writing into means of furthering the message of liberty. I have found that I can create change and I do as a Campus Coordinator with SFL.

Students For Liberty has built upon the lessons instilled in me by my parents and turned me into a leader that they can be proud of. It has become so much more than just an organization to me. SFL has given my life a new direction, using my talents and skills to spread liberty. It has given me a new family, because the people I have met through SFL have become some of my closest friends. Students For Liberty has changed my life in more ways than I can list and the debt of gratitude I owe to this organization and the people in it can never be repaid.

As I walk at graduation next weekend, it will not be as a 22-year-old suddenly thrust into the real world. Instead, I will walk among my classmates as a confident leader. My life isn’t completely figured out, but I know what I want to do now.

My father passed away several years ago and won’t be there to see me graduate, but I know he would be proud of me and all I have accomplished. I will continue to fight for the freedom he believed in, for the principles he told me this country has strayed from. I will fight for my mother whose own college years were spent fighting for freedom, protesting the tyranny of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, her home country. I will fight for my best friend, whose parents fled Poland because of Communism. I will continue to fight for you, for students and alumni of liberty whose dedication to liberty has so inspired me.

For all of you, I will continue to work towards a freer world, for liberty. #FLib.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Liberty Without Borders

Six months ago, I would not have believed that I would soon jump on the overnight sleeper train from St. Petersburg to Moscow to launch first ever student forum for freedom in Russia. Now, flipping through a day’s fill of notes on Russian activism, I recall first nurturing the idea of a DC Forum for Freedom on the bus from Philadelphia in 2008. In the following winter of my freshman year, when we cautiously began coffee shop meetings on U street and colliding into strangers who would one day become long-term friends, we could scarcely predict the spontaneous order that cushioned our college careers; we could scarcely understand that our campus bubbles of young philosophers, humanists, and social entrepreneurs would transform our intellectual landscape in their own self-assured way, triumphing at times over the schooling under our noses.

Irena Schneider (left) at Russia's first ever student forum for freedom

Four years later, I find myself surrounded by new, robust pockets of student activity on the other side of the world, in a country that has historically been condemned by many to an illiberal fate. Where civil society and a culture of activism were presumed dead, however, I found them lurking secretly and happily in the living rooms, select classrooms and offices of an incredible network of young people dedicated no less to the ideas of liberty than we were in the DC Forum.  After giving a talk about SFL to a classical liberal audience at the Adam Smith Forum in Moscow last November, I was shocked to find a group of young people buzzing in excitement about the prospects of working together. Professors and students alike began flooding me with ideas for seminars, fundraising and couchsurfing for liberty, as if holding a banner in big block letters: “Look, bottom line, we have to do something!”

Ever since my friend put those words in my head, seven of the brightest liberty-minded Russian young people in these networks have traveled to the International SFL Conference– and the United States—for the first time in their lives, a trip which is now to be funded annually for future advocates of liberty in the Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg. Breaching the Atlantic is making our community vaster, and collective action more imaginable. In my experience, whether it was helping run liberty-themed English speaking clubs throughout the fall and winter, marching with thousands of people for political freedom as my friends handed out flyers about libertarianism, speaking to audiences of liberal law students or arguing about the merits of Rand over famous Petersburg funnel cake donuts, I’ve come to recognize a multidirectional world of action, one defined by young graduates and scholars unafraid to propose an alternative to their political present and future. The difference between the worlds of activism in Russia and the West is not in their rigor or intellectual curiosity, but in their institutions and opportunities.

Russia's finest freedom fighters at Red Square

In this vein, with regards to methods of outreach, management, marketing, and building networks, our Russian friends will differ from those in the U.S., Belgium, Nigeria, or Guatemala. We come to understand the different textures of the game boards that we use to play the same game. Realizing the goals of a free society is a market-like discovery process. In roundtables all across the United States, SFL has created a platform for negotiating paths of coordination for liberty among young people. This model ultimately transcends borders because it offers no positive program. It is rather a self-reflexive means of nourishing and honing the instinct to act that exists in humans regardless of location. With time, we learn more from one another to better understand our own agency on behalf of ideas. An activist community will eventually discover new branches, seek new sources of light, and allow itself to grow spontaneously.  Our weekend in Moscow opened a difficult dialogue about this area of the world, seeking a means of building social capital and widening the perceived windows of opportunity to liberal ideas from below. Just as the DC forum came to flourish and survive its graduates in the minds of new students, I believe our experience in Moscow will tease out its own new networks and transformative paths to the ideas of liberty as we continue to work together and expand our community across borders.

For information SFL internationally, check out our Charter Teams Program. The application deadline to begin an SFL Charter Team is May 1, 2012. 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Call for Community Organizers for Liberty

This article was originally published in April 2011, but it is still valuable today as we continue to break new ground promoting the ideas of liberty on college campuses all over the world. Be sure to apply for the 2012-2013 Campus Coordinator Class by May 1! 

A common theme of the 2008 election was the conservative media pundits bashing Barack Obama for his background as a “community organizer” on the south side of Chicago.  He was chastised for having learned from Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky, who literally wrote the book on community organizing (Rules for Radicals, if you have not read it do so immediately).  Never mentioned in the media frenzy was the critical role that community organizers play in creating social change. Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

SFL’s New Book: After the Welfare State

Today Students For Liberty is thrilled to announce our new book project: After the Welfare State. Once again students will be able to request up to 500 free copies of this new book for mass distribution on campus this fall.

The third in our series of publications building on the success of The Economics of Freedom and The Morality of Capitalism, we will be tackling one of the most critical issues facing young people today. Edited by Dr. Tom G. Palmer, After the Welfare State will explain the history and motivations of the modern welfare state, examine its current crisis, explain how it is used as an immoral tool of state control and subjection, and propose possible alternatives for providing mutual aid in a world after government imposed welfare programs have run their course.

Our politicians and, frankly, our parents have failed us. They have used the mechanisms of the welfare state to hold power and live off the backs of future generations. Now we have to take our futures into own hands. If not us, who? If not now, when?

In keeping with our model of student empowerment, we will be printing 125,000 copies of this new book for mass distribution on college campuses this fall.

Click here to learn more about the project and request your free copies today.

Dr. Tom Palmer

“Young people today are being robbed. Of their rights.  Of their freedom.  Of their dignity.  Of their futures.  The culprits?  My generation and our predecessors, who either created or failed to stop the world straddling engine of theft, degradation, manipulation, and social control we call the welfare state.”
– Tom G. Palmer

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Story of Empowerment as a Campus Coordinator

This weekend, I had a conversation with some friends at an Institute for Humane Studies seminar about the culture of Students For Liberty. One of the key aspects of SFL’s culture is our theory of empowerment. SFL believes that student leaders should not allow any boundaries and rules laid down by our predecessors to dictate how we engage in social change. Instead, it is our duty to expand libertarianism to new territory through new methods. My successes as a Campus Coordinator during the 2011-2012 school year were largely a result of SFL’s theory of empowerment as well as my willingness to take advantage of that freedom through entrepreneurship in student organizing.

Matt Needham (bottom left) with fellow Michigan students on the road to ISFLC12

As a Campus Coordinator, I have been free to do nearly anything that I believe will further the cause of liberty. At the Campus Coordinator Retreat in July, I worked with Midwest Regional Director Dennis Craig and other Campus Coordinators in my area to set goals for what I wanted to accomplish in my region. These goals were not dictated by any central authority. Throughout the year, I continued a dialog with Dennis about the goals that were within reach, the goals that needed revising, and new goals that I wanted to set for myself.

Not only was I free in goal setting, but I was free to do whatever I felt was necessary to accomplish my goals. One of my goals was to see Michigan be the Midwestern state with highest attendance at the Chicago Regional Conference and at the International Conference. After hearing from student leaders in my area that transportation and lodging were the two largest hurdles they faced in attending these conferences, I set out to organize group transportation and lodging for students from Michigan. For the Regional Conference, I was able to negotiate sponsorship for a charter bus and subsidized lodging from the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, an organization with a strong history of supporting pro-liberty students. For the International Conference, I was able to negotiate sponsorship for a charter bus from a generous donor. SFL’s reputation for successful projects and well-trained leaders granted me the legitimacy I needed in organizing these projects. These projects were well worth my time and effort; Michigan had more than double the number of ISFLC attendees than any other Midwestern state. These students were able to bring knowledge of libertarian ideas and organizing tactics back to their campus in order to further the cause of liberty.

I should add that while these projects were unlikely to happen without my efforts, I did not organize them solely on my own. SFL provides a large network of peers and mentors that have assisted me greatly over the past year. I cannot stress the importance of mentorship enough! There are scores of libertarians experienced in campus activism, public policy, academic research, and other avenues that want to help students. Successful student leaders reach out to these individuals and develop strong relationships.

Moriah Costa (center) at Occupy Phoenix

I am not alone in taking advantage of the freedom allotted to Campus Coordinators. Morgan Freeman, a Campus Coordinator at Sam Houston State University, used a Free Speech Wall event to gain statewide attention about hostility to free speech on college campuses. Luis Silva-Ball, a Campus Coordinator at Universidad Metropolitana in Caracas, translated SFL’s How to Start a Student Organization for Liberty handbook into Spanish. Moriah Costa handed out copies of SFL’s book The Morality of Capitalism at the Occupy Phoenix protests. The success of Students For Liberty does not come solely from empowering students; our success is dependent upon the initiative and ingenuity of local leaders to develop new methods of furthering the cause of liberty.

I strongly encourage all student leaders to join the Campus Coordinator program. Students For Liberty is here to empower you to discover new tactics for furthering the cause of liberty. I do not believe I will see a day when we have run out of new tactics for furthering the cause of liberty so long as SFL continues to empower students and student leaders continue to take advantage of all possible opportunities.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Public Good”: A Tool for Tyranny

This article was originally published in Arizona State University’s The State Press.

Last week, as I was enjoying a cigar at my favorite shop, the man next to me was talking about mandating health care for everyone. He said we all pay for everyone already; society is built on everyone sacrificing his or her interests to the group. This logic sounds reasonable, right? But examining the philosophy behind this very statement will uncover its fallacious nature.

At center stage, collectivism arises as the primary vehicle that fundamentally drives tyrants to power. Veiled by good intentions, the collectivist virus spreads though our economic and political system injected by those who lust for power.

But in order for it to survive, it has to keep changing and adapting to modern ideas. With excuses and explanations to spare, this philosophy is practiced under the banners of security, good will and utility.

Listening to the rhetoric of politicians and reading founding documents from history makes it seem like every action that government or those in power take is in society’s best interest. It implies a continuous improvement. But what is society? What is the “public good”?

A group is just a bunch of individuals coming together. Everyone has different needs and aspirations, and everyone is unequal. This is natural. Margaret Thatcher understood this when she said, “When all the objectives of government include the achievement of equality — other than equality before the law — that government poses a threat to liberty.”

Think about it.

The Patriot Act, the war on drugs and social security were passed under the guise of general welfare. Do you feel safe, healthy and protected? All of these have slated more power to the ruling elite and taken more money and liberties from the people. At the same time, free markets, personal responsibility and choice have been blamed for the problems we face.

It would be unreasonable to assume that people can survive without groups or relying on one another. Communities are essential. But the difference between government action and free market action rests on one term: coercion.

In the market, individuals choose the groups they want to be a part of, buying and selling from and to whom ever they want. In the state, people are mandated — through the threat of force — to give money and rely on our politicians or the votes of the majority to make the right choice.

The relationship between business and government was meant to keep a balance and act as protection from too much power. Granting this relationship is like telling children to stay out of the cookie jar. Corruption is the product of this relationship and the culprit for our financial and social catastrophes.

Last week, my colleague Jonathan Fortner championed taxes and government force in his column. He stated that living in a geographical location (the U.S.) subscribes you to regulation and submission to the state. Collectivism clings to this conclusion and fosters a place where your interests and well being are less important than “the public good,” which is defined by a ruler.

Each modern generation has faced the possibility or threat of some perceived tyrant mandating the lifestyle of the individual. Collectivism has given those who see themselves as more knowledgeable, educated or moral a tool to bring the rest into submission. Break the tribe, rebel against your rulers and be an individual.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment