Learn More
Find A Leader
Support SFL
Make a Donation Join the Network Attend an Event Start a Group

Recent warfare has seen increased use of “drones,” unmanned aircraft used either for surveillance or armed with missiles. According to a UK report, the US Air Force has increased use of drones over 600 percent from 2004-2010. At any given time in 2010, there were at least 36 US drones in the air over Afghanistan and Iraq. Although drone violence is extensive, expensive, and killing thousands of innocent people, public outcry has been relatively minor. Though there have been small community protests across the United States, there’s been no nation=wide outcry against these drone strikes. Why is that? Why aren’t we outraged by this senseless violence on a national level?

Over five years of drone strikes carried out by the United States has resulted in 2,400 deaths. A 2012 study revealed that only 2% of casualties were the people targeted. The rest were all civilian casualties, often referred to collateral damage. In addition to the civilian casualties, the drone program has other costs that are equally as staggering. Winslow Wheeler of the Center for Defense Information has challenged official reports that drones cost $4-$5 million per unit. The MQ-9 Reaper model of drone costs $120 million per group of four units and related equipment, called a CAP. He also points out that the fact that they are unmanned makes them no cheaper in the long run. Though they cost less to fly, the mission lengths are drastically longer, meaning that costs remain high. The Air Force announced in January of 2012 that they would cut their manned aircraft programs in favor of drones to save money. Wheeler however found that one CAP of drones cost around four times as much per year than the cut aircraft, an A-10 fighter jet.

A drone strike in Yemen, aimed at eliminating potential terror threats, killed 12 people in a wedding party in May of 2014. The most deadly drone attack in Yemen killed 41 people, 21 of whom were children (Woods 2012). Ferea al-Muslimi, a young man from Yemen, gave an interview to National Public Radio (NPR) in which he commented that the Yemeni people are starting to see the drone strikes as a fact of life. He said “Mothers in the past used to tell their kids ‘Go to sleep or I will call your father.’ Now they say, ‘Go to sleep or I will call the plane.’”


I’ll start with this: “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” –Desmond Tutu.

After hearing the Darren Wilson verdict last night, one I fully expected, I proceeded to spend a few frustrating hours on social media in order to observe the aftermath and to vocalize my own support for Michael Brown. Now, with a night of reflection, I’ve gathered a number of thoughts that I feel compelled to share, lest I explode all over my computer screen and drop half my friends for their depressingly illogical arguments.

Nov. 24, 2014 is an important day in American history. Last night, our nation awaited a verdict whose implications will be studied in classrooms for years to come, assuming the State does not completely infiltrate and derail the systems of education by then. Given its prominence, at the very least, you should care about the outcome of the State of Missouri vs. Darren Wilson. However, more than that, I submit that you should be angry at the verdict, and more importantly, cognizant of its many implications. To that end, here are just three takeaways:


One of our speakers for the upcoming 2015 ISFLC February 13th-15th  will be Jeffrey Tucker! 

Jeffrey Tucker is Chief Liberty Office of Liberty.me, a social network and online publishing platform for the liberty minded. He is also distinguished fellow Foundation for Economic Education, executive editor of Laissez-Faire Books, research fellow Acton Institute, founder CryptoCurrency Conference, and author five books.

Check out the links below to learn more about Tucker’s work:

Articles, blog posts & more about Tucker:
Lectures & Interviews:

In the first post of this series, I gave some reasons why libertarians ought to reject the practice of punishment. As an alternative, I suggested that the only proper role of law is dispute resolution, and that law’s violence can only be used in either direct defense or the collection of restitution. In effect, this eliminates criminal law, leaving only civil law in its place.

In what follows, I’ll try to bolster that conclusion by briefly showing why libertarians ought to oppose criminal law, beyond just the illegitimacy of punishment.


This post is part of a new “Student Spotlight” SFL blog series in which we honor the best and brightest student activists in our network by highlighting the top student, group, and event of the week and share their accomplishments to inspire other leaders to step up their game in advancing the cause of liberty. 

Congratulations to Nikola Ristić, Ana Jakšić, Konstantin Lijakovic, Vuk Velebit, and every member of the Studenti Za Slobodu – FPN (Students For Liberty – Faculty of Political Sciences) for being chosen as SFL’s Group of the Week! This group also works with Studenti Za Slobodu – Srbija (Students For Liberty – Serbia). We want to recognize both groups for their courageous commitment to liberty. They stood firmly for liberty when a group of Neo-Nazis stormed their ESFL End the Drug War Event, and they organized a protest against violence in University Institutions when the Dean of Political Faculty was attacked by two young men. Learn more about SFL’s group of the week from Nikola Ristić:

Group’s Mission & Focus 

Our organization is a student organization whose goal is to develop and promote awareness among students about the importance of civil rights and freedom by encouraging student activism and academic interest for political theory. We are promoting the ideas of individual freedom, limited government and free market economics. To do this in a successful way, our group is highly focused on activism, ideas and social connections. In addition to the above-mentioned protest against violence, an example of our activism is our “Taxpayers March,” which we organized in cooperation with Libertarian Club – Libek from Belgrade, Serbia. We focus on ideas by organizing public panel discussions such as our recent events on marijuana legalization, media freedom in Serbia, and internal discussions about works of political and social theorists.

Our group mainly focus on individual rights and the individual responsibilities that they entail.


Sign up for the SFL Newsletter

Enter your email to stay on top of things,