Indeed, increasingly Capital reaches into our very cells and DNA. Capital, in its never-ending quest for new markets (either to discover them or to create them), is constantly taking gift or volunteer relations and attacking them. Consider the Skymall executive you’re having at your conference as a prime example of this. The capitalist sees this as providing a service or creating a new market, but the anti-capitalist sees it as destroying a human relation that preceded it, or in fact imposing a market where none was necessary.

There are many problems with this but one big one is that the human values that once determined relations become replaced by the values of Capital (profit, exploitation, commodity, etc). Another problem is that capitalist relations are hierarchical. If we want our ducks in a row, then we have to oppose capitalism on those terms as well as others.

Another problem is that Capital is produced by humans and extracted from those who produce it (surplus value) and given to the capitalist precisely because of the authoritarianism inherent in the worker/owner relationship (for instance). Capitalism therefore cannot be non-hierarchical or else profit would disappear. Likewise, the capitalist relation is always coercive. It has to be. No one gives up their surplus value for free.

At the end of the day, capitalism violates the very principles that those who uphold the “anarcho-cap” and libertarian ideal defend most: the non-aggression principle. “Anarcho-capitalism” is therefore in contradiction to itself.

The song presents a powerful message about unborn children who were aborted and how they find a loving, peaceful home with their Heavenly Father.

Don’t that sound like heaven has also been adopted as the theme song for anti-abortion organization, Fight 4 Life.

The song may be reviewed at the following link. Just copy it and paste it into your browser. It will take you to the song.

http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cf...

Thank you for your prayers and continued support for Palmetto State Quartet.

Please visit us at http://www.psqworld.com after design

1.) If the capitalists acquired their wealth through state power and not productivity, I don't believe they have any right to it.

2.) I know there are lots of anarchists who are against money. I'm more of an anarchist without adjectives in this way. I'd like to free society and people through voluntaryism and see which systems work best and are the most just. I suspect money works very well and would continue to do so, but would be open to other forms of exchange being superior.

3.) I don't have an a priori objection to wage labor, but I do find it undesirable. It would be outmoded pretty quickly in a free society where Tucker's Four Monopolies were abolished. A free market would provide for many many many more coops, collectives, and worker-owned and operated businesses. I think that is a great thing to aim for.

4.) I'd need more details here (maybe an article)? But sure, the corporations virtually run the entire planet and economy.

My biggest concern is keeping means consistent with the ends. So yes, I completely acknowledge, the same as you, that anyone who now has wealth through state power has not earned property in a just manner. However, I don't think very many small businessmen consciously understand what is manifesting itself as capitalism. Most people are just market actors bumbling along. So I'm not sure exactly how we are to deal with people like that who just respond the best way they can to the cards they're given.

However, the ultra rich who actively manipulate the state to their advantage are another story.