Norman Horn is a graduate student in Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin and studies theology at the Austin Graduate School of Theology. He is the former President of the Libertarian Longhorns, and currently serves as Treasurer and Webmaster. He was a 2010 nominee for Student of the Year by Students for Liberty. Norman is also becoming increasingly well-known for his work at LibertarianChristians.com, which focuses on the intersections of liberty and the Christian faith.
What do Representative Ron Paul, Doug Bandow from the Cato Institute, Isaac Morehouse from the Institute for Humane Studies, Larry Reed from FEE, Thomas Woods from the Mises Institute, David Thoreaux from the Independent Institute, and Leo Tolstoy all have in common? They all hate statism, and they are all Christians.
Christianity sometimes gets a bad rap in libertarian circles. Certain fundamentalist Christians have a history of using the State to enforce their particular moral values upon others. The so-called “social gospel” proponents wish to dismantle the free market and have the State redistribute wealth the way they think is right. And of course, those significantly influenced by Ayn Rand have a very negative view of religion in general.
Yet, surely it doesn’t have to be this way. Christianity has historically been on the side of liberty. Classical liberalism developed from an understanding of the Christian worldview which placed a high value on man’s freedom to choose. In fact, in my opinion Christians ought to be among the greatest proponents of libertarianism on the planet. But first, we should very briefly discuss some of the misconceptions about Christianity that turn off some libertarians. Then, we need to clarify how exactly Christianity and libertarianism support each other, and describe what “Christian libertarianism” actually is.
Four Misconceptions about Christianity and Politics
Christianity does not advocate socialism. Some scholars think that Jesus essentially taught wealth redistribution, and that the early Christian community in Acts 4 was a form of socialistic organizational structure. Yet, one cannot deny that Jesus emphasized voluntary assistance, not coercion. The early Christians did not force people to be charitable, and in fact did respect private property. That old saying you’ve probably heard, “Money is the root of all evil,” is actually a misquote of the Bible. In reality, it reads, “The love of money is the root of all kinds of evil,” and teaches us that greed often leads to sin.
Christianity does not glorify violence and war. It is truly unfortunate that modern American churches have abandoned the peaceful message of the Christian Gospel for the State’s means of “spreading democracy.” Jesus came to bring “peace on earth, good will to men,” and by extension the Christian’s goal ought to be the same.
Christianity does not advocate a theocratic state. While God did give the Israelites in the Old Testament a series of civil laws for their community’s well-being, there is absolutely no mandate in the New Testament for Christians to establish a new kind of state governed by Biblical law. It is not the Christian’s place to lord power over others. God rules within the hearts of his people now, not via a human ruler. As many early American revolutionaries stated, “We have no king but King Jesus.”
Christianity is not a theory to legitimize the state. Governments play a prominent role in the Bible, but in no way can one extend their presence to their rightness in the world. Even Romans 13 and the famous “Render unto Caesar” passages, which many take as the classic proof-texts in Scripture for the necessity of government, are more logically understood as prudential arguments for how to deal with the presence of government than as justifications for government.
Four Connections between Christianity and Libertarianism
Christianity supports a libertarian theory of property rights. Self-ownership with respect to other human beings is assumed in the Bible. Contrary to how many view the Old Testament, forced slavery was a capital offense. While all economic systems of organization have systems of ownership, Christianity in particular agrees with libertarians on the homestead principle, that the first user is the determiner of how a resource may be used. Those who misappropriate others property are considered aggressors and lawbreakers.
Christianity loves the free market and peaceful interaction. The Bible is full of examples showing clearly how voluntary interaction, that is, the free market, is far preferable to coercion. Besides showing the way to salvation, God’s message to men everywhere is that loving your neighbor as you love yourself ultimately results in peace and prosperity. Of course, this principle does not imply that bad things will not happen to us, but it does transcend momentary suffering and we can strive toward it.
Christianity affirms that no one should receive special privileges of position. God does not show favoritism, and therefore we are to do the same. All men are equal under God’s law. No one gets special moral permission to do what others cannot because they wear a uniform or because 51% of a population says they should.
Christianity says that the State is a rebellion against man’s true nature and purpose. Man was not intended to live under the constant threat of aggression from involuntary, arbitrary authority of other men. On the contrary, we are meant to live in peaceful, loving relationships with God and our neighbor. However, when one does not accept the rule of God, the tyranny of men through the evil of statism is likely to develop. The State invariably sets itself up in opposition to God and pits men against each other.
These explanations are by necessity brief, and of course there are many additional theological topics and Scripture references that could be discussed. Nevertheless, we can clearly see here that Christianity and libertarianism have much in common. More and more Christians around the world are realizing that their previous way of understanding politics neither benefits others nor honors God. Christian libertarians have the answer: stop giving the government special theological and moral status and withdraw your consent. The State is not the Kingdom of God, and it never will be.

















Excellent exposition Norman. Proud to know you.
The Bible claims Jesus said it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven.
In other words, if you produce a lot of wealth and don't share it, you'll burn for all of eternity. Of course you have the "right" to burn for all of eternity.
How is locking someone in a cage for not paying their taxes to support social welfare programs any different than condemning someone to hell for the same crime?
BTW, you are unintentionally neglecting one serious aspect of a true free market and trade. In providing goods and services for others that satisfy their needs and wants, you are, quite literally serving them. God created a win-win world, whereby we can all benefit one another through productive effort. There is no automatically gained virtue by being poor, and there is no automatically attained vice by being rich. Love God, love your neighbor, that's what matters.
Context. Is it saying having money will keep you from heaven, that having it, acquiring, doing anything other than paying it to others, will result in the man not reaching the kingdom of God? Or is it simply reiterating that you cannot buy your way in?
Is it really saying you must pay your money or else be punished? I don't think that it is.
Thus, objecting to taxation and abuse through taxation is a correct viewpoint, but it is not contrary to doctrine and thus does not make liberty contrary to doctrine or make doctrine subordinate to liberty.
In the time of Jesus, there really was only one way to become rich: take advantage of people, usually through the power of the State (although sometimes as part of the religious establishment). In fact, there was no middle class at all — you were either part of the elite-and-in-power or you were poor. So when Jesus indites the "rich", he's saying that you can't think that you can have a lifestyle of taking advantage of others and expect God to let you enter heaven.
Pingback: SFL Lessons in Liberty: Christian Libertarianism | LibertarianChristians.com
As a Christian myself. I’ve always seen the passage concerning the camel & needle as being a reference to the fact that when you have a lot of money it is harder to recognize that we really need God.
If you are rich you take care of all your own needs. You provide shelter, food, water, clothing. Plus you’re able to provide for others. If you so choose to do.
How do you convince someone they need God when they don’t need anything. Salvation is not something that can be seen. So, it’s hard to convince someone that that is what they need.
My take on it, anyway.
I think that quite a few "rich" people wind up asking themselves "Is this all there is?". They've found that money and or power doesn't satisfy every longing that they have. Unfortunately a good portion think that if they only had more, then they'd be satisfied. Deep down I think they realize that they're lying to themselves. But maybe not, possibly the craving for more has corrupted their souls. The constant pursuit of more of anything shows a real lack of security that can only be found with God, through His Son, Jesus.
Pingback: News of the Week: Dec. 12-18, 2010 | LibertarianChristians.com
Pingback: Shockingly, it’s true: You can love liberty and still be a Jesus follower « David McElroy